Several instruments and devices are employed to document western blotting results (see table below).
- Densitometers — based on high-performance document scanners with minor modifications (leak-resistant scanning surface, built-in calibration tool) and utilize visible light for analysis of electrophoresis gels (transmission mode) and blots (reflective mode) stained with visible dyes
- CCD (charge-couple device) cameras — versatile systems that can image gels and blots, and operate with either transillumination provided by light boxes (visible or UV) positioned underneath the gel for imaging a variety of stains (Coomassie, silver, fluorescence) or epi-illumination of blots detected using colorimetric or fluorescence techniques. Different illumination wavelengths are available for multiplex fluorescence immunodetection. CCD cameras can also be used to detect chemiluminescent signals for which illumination is not needed. Super-cooled CCD cameras reduce image noise, allowing detection of faint luminescent signals with high sensitivity
- Laser-based imagers — offer the highest sensitivity, resolution, and linear dynamic range and are powerful image acquisition tools for gels and blots with proteins fluorescently labeled or stained with fluorescent dyes such as SYPRO Ruby or Flamingo. These imagers can be configured with lasers of different wavelengths, allowing single- or multiplex fluorescence detection. Laser scanners allow selective detection of multiple fluorescence labels on gels and blots
- Phosphor imagers — laser-based systems capable of imaging storage phosphor screens which form a latent image when exposed to gamma and beta radiation. These screens have a large dynamic range and offer excellent sensitivity and quantitative accuracy with imaging times that are a fraction of those for film
- X-ray film — widely used for imaging autoradiographic and chemiluminescent blots but suffers from a limited dynamic range as well as a nonlinear response through this range. This method also requires the investment in and maintenance of a film developer and often requires processing multiple film sheets to obtain a usable image. Decreasing costs, superior quantitative data quality, better ease of use, are making CCD cameras and imagers preferred over film for these detection techniques
Comparison of western blot documentation and analysis methods.
| |
Imaging System |
| |
Gel Doc™ |
|
ChemiDoc™ |
|
Pharos™ |
|
GS-800™ |
| |
EZ |
XR+ |
|
XRS+ |
MP |
|
FX |
FX Plus |
PMI |
|
|
| Immunodetection |
| Chemiluminescence |
— |
— |
|
• |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
| Colorimetric |
— |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
• |
| Fluorescence |
— |
— |
|
— |
• |
|
• |
• |
— |
|
— |
| Autoradiography |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
— |
• |
• |
|
— |
| Chemifluorescence |
— |
— |
|
— |
• |
|
• |
• |
— |
|
— |
| Total Protein Stain |
| Colorimetric |
— |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
• |
| Fluorescent |
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
• |
|
— |
| Stain-free |
• |
— |
|
— |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
— |
| Imager Type |
CCD |
CCD |
|
Supercooled CCD |
Supercooled CCD |
|
Laser |
Laser |
Laser |
|
Densitometer |
| Excitation Type |
| Trans UV/Vis |
• |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
N/A |
| Epi white |
— |
• |
|
• |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
N/A |
| LED RGB |
— |
— |
|
— |
• |
|
— |
— |
— |
|
N/A |
| Laser RGB |
— |
— |
|
— |
— |
|
• |
• |
•* |
|
N/A |
| * Only 532 nm laser available |
For chemiluminescence detection, CCD imaging is the easiest, most accurate, and rapid method. Traditionally, the chemiluminescent signal from blots was detected by X-ray film. Film is a sensitive medium for capturing the chemiluminescent signal but suffers from a sigmoidal response to light with a narrow region of linear response, which limits its dynamic range. To gather information from a blot that has both intense and weak signals, multiple exposures are required to produce data for all samples in the linear range of the film. A process termed preflashing can improve linearity but this requires extra equipment and effort. Additionally, quantitation of data collected by exposure to film requires digitization (that is, scanning of X-ray film with a densitometer).
CCD cameras have a linear response over a broad dynamic range – 2-5 orders of magnitude – depending on the bit depth of the system. CCD cameras also offer convenience by providing a digital record of experiments for data analysis, sharing, and archiving, and by eliminating the need to continually purchase consumables for film development. Some CCD imagers offer chemiluminescent sensitivity equal to film.
Fluorescence, chemifluorescence, and colorimetric detection all benefit from the advantages of digital imaging: convenience, digital records of experiments, sensitive, and wide dynamic ranges. Fluorescent and chemifluorescent signals can be detected with different types of imaging systems, including CCD and laser-based technologies. For example, the ChemiDoc™ MP and PharosFX™ Plus systems can be used similarly to detect fluorescent and chemifluorescent signals. The decision to use one type of technology over another depends on budget and requirements for limit of detection and resolution. CCD systems are generally less expensive than laser-based systems. The resolution of CCD and laser-based systems can be similar, with the finest resolution settings of 50 µm when used for gels and blots. Another advantage of fluorescence and chemifluorescence detection is that the detection limits and dynamic range of CCD and laser-based systems generally far exceed the dynamic ranges of the fluorescence assays currently used for protein detection.
Colorimetric samples can be easily recorded and analyzed with a densitometer such as the GS-800™ calibrated densitometer. The densitometer provides a highly reproducible digital record of the blot with excellent image resolution, and accurate quantitation. The GS-800 densitometer uses red, green, and blue color CCD technology to enhance detection of a wide range of colorimetric staining reagents.
To detect the commonly used beta emitting radioisotopes, 35S, 32P, 33P, 12C, and 125I, the most widely used method is autoradiography on X-ray film. Autoradiography provides a good combination of sensitivity and resolution without a large investment in detection substrates or imaging systems. For direct autoradiography the response of the film is linear only within a range of 1-2 orders of magnitude. Use of intensifying screens and fluorographic scintillators can increase sensitivity, and pre-exposing film to a flash of light can improve linearity. However, these measures to improve signal detection are limited. Phosphor imagers, such as Bio-Rad's PharosFX Plus system or Personal Molecular Imager™ (PMI) system, offer an alternative in detecting gels and blots labeled with beta emitting radioisotopes. The initial investment in instrumentation frees up time and resources associated with using X-ray film and offers increased sensitivity, wider dynamic range and 10 to 20 times shorter exposure times than those for X-ray film detection. The ability to accurately quantitate data is much greater with storage phosphor screens because the linear dynamic range of phosphor imagers is significantly greater – 5 orders of magnitude – enabling accurate quantitation and the elimination of over-exposure and saturated signals.
Blot detection using an imaging system needs a robust software package for image acquisition. In addition, a good software package can magnify, rotate, resize, overlay, and annotate the corresponding gel and blot images, allowing export of the images to common documentation software. A good software package also allows analysis of the blot image and comparisons of relative signal intensities, protein molecular weight, or other aspects.
For automated acquisition and analysis of gel and blot images, Bio-Rad offers: