qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

print

Overview

qPCR Assay Design and Optimization
A successful PCR reaction requires efficient and specific amplification of the product. Both the primers and the target sequence can affect this efficiency. Therefore, care must be taken when choosing a target sequence and designing primers. This section provides information and tips on designing primers and probes, choosing a target sequence, multiplexing, selecting reporters and quenchers, and validating and optimizing assays.

Related Topics: High Resolution Melting, Real-Time PCR Data Analysis, and Troubleshooting.

Step-by Step Primer Design Strategy

When designing primers, follow these steps:

  • Check literature and databases (e.g. www.rtprimerdb.org) for existing primers
  • Choose a target sequence
  • Design primers and probes
  • Check primer specificity
  • Assess primer and probe properties (for example, melting temperature [Tm], secondary structure, complementarity)
  • Assess PCR product properties
  • Validate primers

A number of free Internet resources are available to help you with primer design websites (see websites tab below). Commercially available programs, such as Beacon Designer Software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA), perform both primer design and target sequence selection.

Choosing a Target Sequence

When choosing a region of the target to amplify, follow these guidelines:

  • Plan to amplify a 75–200 bp product. Short PCR products are typically amplified with higher efficiency than longer ones but a PCR product should be at least 75 bp to easily distinguish it from any primer-dimers that could potentially form
  • Avoid regions that have secondary structure, when possible. Use programs such as mfold (http://mfold.rna.albany.edu/?q=mfold) to predict whether a PCR product will form any secondary structure at the annealing temperature
  • Avoid regions with long (>4) repeats of single bases
  • Choose a region that has a GC content of 50–60%

Designing Primers

When designing primers, follow these guidelines:

  • Design primers that have a GC content of 50–60%
  • Strive for a Tm between 50 and 65°C. One way to calculate Tm values is by using the nearest-neighbor method. Use the Tm calculator at http://www.basic.northwestern.edu/biotools/oligocalc.html, with values of 50 mM for salt concentration and 300 nM for oligonucleotide concentration
  • Avoid secondary structure; adjust primer locations so that they are outside the target sequence secondary structure, if required
  • Avoid repeats of Gs or Cs longer than 3 bases
  • Place Gs and Cs on ends of primers
  • Check the sequence of forward and reverse primers to ensure no 3' complementarity (avoid primer-dimer formation)
  • Verify specificity using tools such as the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST)

Designing Probes

Primers can be combined with DNA-binding dyes in amplification reactions to monitor the appearance of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). However, for greater specificity, fluorescently labeled probes can be used. The most common are hydrolysis probes (see Real-Time PCR Chemistries for more details).

The Tm of a hydrolysis probe should be 5–10°C higher than that of the primers. In most cases, the probe should be <30 nucleotides. It must not have a G at its 5' end because this could quench the fluorescence signal even after hydrolysis. Choose a sequence within the target that has a GC content of 30–80%, and design the probe to anneal to the strand that has more Gs than Cs (so the probe contains more Cs than Gs).

Multiplexing

Currently, it is possible to amplify and quantify as many as five targets in a single tube, depending on the features of your real-time PCR instrument. Multiplexing confers the following advantages over singleplex reactions:

  • Reduction in the amount of starting template required, which is important when the amount of starting material is limited
  • Reduction in false negatives, if a control target is amplified within each sample
  • Increased laboratory throughput with a concomitant reduction in reagent costs
  • Minimization of sample handling and associated opportunities for laboratory contamination

Successful multiplexing of reactions requires careful experimental design and optimization of reaction conditions. Simply combining all primers and templates in the same tube is not sufficient. This is because amplification of any one target can influence the amplification of other targets in the same tube. A common challenge for multiplex real-time PCR is amplifying targets that have significantly different concentrations.

Primer and Probe Design
Design all primers to have approximately the same Tm (55–60°C), and also design all probes to have approximately the same Tm (~5–10°C higher than that of the primers). It is important to make sure that the different primer and probe sets do not exhibit complementarity to one another because all primers and probes will be present in one reaction.

Selection of Reporters and Quenchers for Probes
Multiplex reactions require multiple reporters — one to follow each amplification reaction. To distinguish each reaction, choose reporter fluorophores with minimally overlapping emission spectra. The selected fluorophores must also be compatible with the excitation and emission filters of your real-time instrument.

Assay Validation and Optimization

To achieve accurate quantification of template in real-time PCR, each reaction must efficiently amplify a single product, and the efficiency of amplification must be independent of template concentration and the amplification of other templates. Therefore, you should validate your real-time PCR assay to verify that these conditions hold.

Determining Reaction Efficiency: Using a Standard Curve
A common method for validating a real-time PCR assay involves constructing a standard. The standard curve helps you to determine the efficiency, linear dynamic range, and reproducibility of the assay. The efficiency of the assay should be 90–105%, the R2 of the standard curve should be >0.980 or r >–0.990, and the quantification cycle (Cq) values of the replicates should be similar.

If you are performing a multiplex assay, you should validate and optimize the individual assays before combining them in the multiplex assay. Note that the range of template concentrations used for the standard curve must encompass the entire range of template concentrations of the test samples to demonstrate that results from the test samples are within the dynamic range of the assay.

Assay Specificity Verification: Melt Curve and Gel Analysis
Melt curve analysis can be used to identify different reaction products, including nonspecific products and primer-dimers, if fluorescence of the assay's reporter chemistry depends on the presence of dsDNA (for example, SYBR® Green I dye). This is valuable because the presence of secondary nonspecific products and primer-dimers can severely reduce the amplification efficiency and, ultimately, the accuracy of the data. Primer-dimers can also limit the dynamic range of the desired standard curve due to competition for reaction components during amplification. After completion of the amplification reaction, a melt curve is generated by increasing the temperature in small increments and monitoring the fluorescence signal at each step. As the dsDNA in the reaction denatures, the fluorescence decreases rapidly and significantly. A plot of the negative first derivative of the change in fluorescence (-d(RFU)/dT, the rate of change of fluorescence) vs. temperature has distinct peaks that correspond to the Tm of each product (Figure 1).

Melt curve analysis of products from a SYBR Green I assay

Fig. 1. Melt curve analysis of products from a SYBR® Green I assay. A, the negative first derivative of the change in fluorescence plotted as a function of temperature. The two peaks indicate the presence of two PCR products. B, gel analysis of the qPCR products. Lane 1, AmpliSize® 50 – 20,000 bp molecular ruler; lanes 2 and 3, two replicates of qPCR product from the reaction shown in A. The two separate bands in the gel confirm the presence of two PCR products.

The melt peak distinguishes specific products from other products, such as primer-dimers, which melt at different temperatures. Because of their small size, primer-dimers usually melt at lower temperatures than the desired product, whereas nonspecific amplification can result in PCR products that melt at temperatures above or below that of the desired product. In the melt curve above, the peak at 89°C represents the specific product and corresponds to the upper band in lanes 2 and 3 on the gel. The peak at 78°C represents the nonspecific product and corresponds to the lower band in lanes 2 and 3 on the gel.

Annealing Temperature Optimization Optimizing the annealing temperature of your real-time PCR assay is one of the most critical parameters for reaction specificity. Setting the annealing temperature too low may lead to amplification of nonspecific PCR products. On the other hand, setting the annealing temperature too high may reduce the yield of a desired PCR product. Even after calculating the Tm of a primer, you may need to determine the annealing temperature empirically. This involves repeating a reaction at many different temperatures.

The optimal annealing temperature for an assay can easily be determined using qPCR instruments that have a thermal gradient feature. All Bio-Rad real-time PCR detection systems offer a gradient feature. The gradient feature allows you to test a range of temperatures simultaneously, so the annealing temperature can be optimized in a single experiment.

To find the optimal annealing temperature for your reaction, test a range of temperatures above and below the calculated Tm of the primers. The optimal annealing temperature is the one that results in the lowest Cq with no nonspecific amplification. A sample annealing temperature optimization experiment is shown in Figure 2.

Annealing temperature optimization

Fig. 2. Annealing temperature optimization. An annealing temperature gradient from 55 to 72°C was performed. The 62.2°C reaction gave the lowest Cq value and was selected as the annealing temperature for this assay.

Because SYBR® Green I binds to all dsDNA, it is necessary to check the specificity of your qPCR assay by analyzing the reaction product(s). To do this, use the melt curve function on your real-time instrument and also run products on an agarose gel. Figure 3 shows the melt curve and agarose gel analyses from the annealing temperature optimization experiment shown in Figure 2. The reaction with annealing temperature at 62.2°C is shown. An optimized SYBR® Green I qPCR reaction should have a single peak in the melt curve, corresponding to the single band on the agarose gel, as shown in Figure 3.

Verification of SYBR<sup>®</sup> Green I reaction specificity

Fig. 3. Verification of SYBR® Green I reaction specificity. A, melt curve analysis with the first derivative of the change in fluorescence intensity as a function of temperature is plotted. B, agarose gel analysis of the reaction products. Lane 1, molecular weight markers, 100 – 1,000 bp in 100 bp increments, 1,200 bp and 1,500 bp. Lane 2, single PCR product corresponding to the peak observed in A.

Multiplex Assay Validation
To obtain accurate results from a multiplex assay, you must ensure that no target's amplification influences that of another. To determine whether all reactions proceed independently in the multiplex assay, run singleplex and multiplex assays for your targets in the same plate and compare the Cq values. The values obtained for a given target in the singleplex and multiplex assays should not differ significantly. If the Cq values from the singleplex and multiplex reactions are significantly different, you will need to optimize your reactions.

Multiplex Assay Optimization
If a multiplex reaction is not optimized, the amplification of a more efficient or more abundant target can inhibit that of a less efficient or less abundant target. This happens because reaction components, such as DNA polymerase, dNTPs, and MgCl2, become limiting in later cycles, and the amplification of the less efficient or less abundant target is compromised. Inhibition of a target's amplification will cause its Cq in the multiplex reaction to be delayed relative to that in the singleplex reaction. One method for optimizing multiplex reactions involves sequentially increasing the concentrations of DNA polymerase, dNTPs, and MgCl2.

Related Content

Validating a SYBR Green I Assay
Quantitative PCR (qPCR): Validating a SYBR® Green I Assay
This tutorial describes the characteristics of an optimized SYBR® Green I quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. qPCR assays must be optimized to ensure results that are biologically and statistically significant. Topics include a brief review of qPCR chemistry, with an emphasis on SYBR® Green I reactions, and definitions of the four main characteristics, or hallmarks, of an optimized qPCR assay.
 
Quantitative PCR (qPCR): Hallmarks of an Optimized SYBR® Green I Assay
This tutorial describes the characteristics of an optimized SYBR® Green I quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. qPCR assays must be optimized to ensure results that are biologically and statistically significant. Topics include a brief review of qPCR chemistry, with an emphasis on SYBR® Green I reactions, and definitions of the four main characteristics, or hallmarks, of an optimized qPCR assay.
 
Literature
Number Description Download
5692 Real-Time qPCR as a Tool for Evaluating RNAi-Mediated Gene Silencing, Rev A (tech note) Click to download
5859 A Practical Approach to RT-qPCR — Publishing Data That Conform to the MIQE Guidelines, Rev D Click to download
5962 Fast Optimization of a Multiplex Influenza Identification Panel Using a Thermal Gradient, Rev A Click to download
Find Products & Information
Search
Ask an Expert

Call us at 1-800-4-BIORAD (1-800-424-6723)

Related Technologies