Stem Cell Research

print

Overview

Stem cells are cells that remain undifferentiated, maintain prolonged and sustained proliferation in certain parts of the body, and have the potential to differentiate into a variety of cell types. Stem cells have the potential to treat a variety of diseases and are important in medical research and drug development.

This section provides an overview and history of stem cells, and compares the different types of stem cells, such as embryonic stem (ES) cells, somatic stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).

What Are Stem Cells

During development, cells progressively lose the ability to differentiate into multiple cell types. During the first stage of development cells are totipotent and able to give rise to all cells of an organism. As development continues, cells differentiate and become pluripotent (able to differentiate into all cells of the embryo except trophoblast). As the embryo develops, cells become multipotent (able to give rise to a particular cell type of a given lineage) or unipotent (terminally differentiated and only able to give rise to a single cell type or lineage). Pluripotent cells can maintain prolonged, undifferentiated proliferation (self-renewal). In humans, they have the potential to form any one of the 220 different cell types.

Upon fertilization, each cell in an organism carries identical genetic material known as genomic DNA. As an organism develops, the expression of genetic material is altered by internal and external environmental factors that decide their fate in the organism. The mass of cells formed four to five days after fertilization is known as a blastocyst. The blastocyst contains a mass of inner cells known as the embryoblast and a mass of outer cells known as the trophoblast. The trophoblast becomes the placenta and surrounds a hollow cavity called the blastocoel and an inner cell mass (ICM), a group of cells at one end of the blastocoel that develops into the embryo proper. Pluripotent ES cells are derived from the ICM.

Stem cell differentiation.

Stem cell differentiation.

Historical Perspective

Long before ES cells were cultivated in vitro, scientists were trying to understand regeneration. In the 1950s, Briggs and King developed a technique for replacing the nucleus of a frog's egg with the nucleus of another cell. In 1962, Gurdon used this technique to swap the nucleus of a fully differentiated small intestine cell into an egg to clone a frog. These experiments demonstrated that the changes seen in development are not due to permanent changes to the genetic code and that differentiation can occur in response to environmental factors. Subsequently, it was deduced that factors present in the oocyte must play a role in driving differentiation and development.

In the 1950s and 1960s, a tumor isolated from a mouse and known as a teratocarcinoma was studied in great detail. In 1964, Kleinsmith and Pierce demonstrated that these cells had unlimited self-renewal capabilities and multi-lineage differentiation, hence they were pluripotent. The establishment of stable cultures of these embryonic cancer (EC) cells by Kahan and Ephrussi (1970) was the precursor of ES cell culture. In the interim, EC cells were isolated from humans. Although these cells were useful for a variety of studies, most had limited therapeutic potential due to the genetic changes that occurred during tumor formation.

In the 1960s, McCulloch and Till conducted a series of experiments for measuring radiation sensitivity and used bone marrow cells for their transplantations. They observed spleen nodules containing dividing cells and subsequently traced their origin to a single stem cell (Becker et al. 1963, Siminovitch et al. 1963, Till et al. 1964). These early experiments form the basis for modern day adult and embryonic stem cell research.

Embryonic Stem Cells

Mouse ES (mES) cells were first cultivated successfully by Evans and Kaufmann (1981) and Martin (1981). The cells were derived from the ICM of mouse blastocysts and maintained in culture on a layer of mitotically inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblast cells known as "feeder cells" that provide optimal culture conditions.

The addition of other molecules known as cytokines (LIF and BMP-2) was found to enhance continued cell growth (see Yu and Thomson (2008) review).

Human ES (hES) cells were successfully cultivated and maintained in an undifferentiated state by Thomson et al. (1998). Borrowing from research done in primates (Thomson et al. 1995, 1996) as well as work done in culturing human in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos (Gardner et al. 1998), Thomson's team developed conditions optimal for growth and maintenance of hES cells. While the feeder cell layer used in culturing mES cells was similarly employed for the cells, it was discovered that biochemical pathways and growth factors involved in hES maintenance were quite different from the mES cells. Recent advances in growth conditions have now eliminated the need for feeder cells in many cases, replacing them with an artificial matrix and more defined growth media. Cells grown under these conditions are karotypically normal, i.e. the chromosomes appear normal when stained, and even after prolonged proliferation in the undifferentiated state can give rise to each of the three cell types found in the embryo.

WiCEll (www.wicell.org) was formed in 1999 as a repository for human stem cell lines. As the National and International Stem Cell Bank, it grows, characterizes, and distributes hES cells and induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells (see more below) to academic and industrial partners. The Stem Cell Unit at the National Institutes of Health also provides a database of federally approved stem cell lines against which any new hES or iPS cells can be compared. In Europe, the UK Stem Cell Bank (www.ukstemcellbank.org.uk) provides a repository of human stem cell lines. Its role is to provide stocks of these cells to researchers worldwide. The European Human Embryonic Stem Cell Registry (www.hescreg.eu), based in Berlin, provides the stem cell community with an in-depth overview on the current status of hES cell research in Europe. The Stem Cell Network – Asia-Pacific (SNAP) (www.asiapacificstemcells.org) was formed in 2007 with a mission of building a strong and dynamic stem cell research community in the Asia-Pacific region.

Adult or Somatic Stem Cells

Stem cells can also be isolated from the adult organism. These cells, known as somatic stem cells, are multi or unipotent. They are found in different organs of the body, including the bone marrow, stomach, intestines, nose, and liver. Unlike embryonic stem cells, somatic stem cells differentiate into the cell type from which they originate. These cells are used by the body to maintain and repair the originating tissue. Scientists are still uncovering other areas of the body that contain these quiescent stem cells and are attempting to understand their role. Adult stem cells have been used extensively for research as well as clinical applications. For instance, bone marrow contains stem cells that are constantly replenishing the blood system with specific cells required for survival. Bone marrow transplants are a common treatment in patients with severe leukemia and other blood-related diseases. Recent efforts are focused on stem cells in the brain for treatment of Alzheimer's and related dementia disease (Taupin 2009) and in the heart for treatment of cardiac problems (Barile et al. 2009).

Hematopoietic cell differentiation.

Hematopoietic cell differentiation.

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

All cells in the body, except for sex (germ) cells, contain approximately the same genetic material. In theory, if the "imprinting" that pushed a cell down a specific differentiation pathway could be erased, a cell could again become pluripotent. This imprinting can be caused by proteins such as transcription factors binding the DNA, the addition of molecules such as methyl groups to sites on the DNA, or the addition of methyl and acetyl groups or the molecule ubiquitin onto the histones. Removal of these changes can contribute to reverting the expression of genes in the cell so that it becomes pluripotent.

In 2006, Takahashi and Yamanaka demonstrated that by introducing four genes, Oct4, Sox2, Kfl4, and cMyc, into a differentiated mouse cell, the cell could become pluripotent. These "reprogrammed" cells were similar to mES cells, but they still contained some of the epigenetic patterning created through developmental differentiation. Additionally, these iPS cells did not support the development of viable chimeric mice upon injection into the blastocyst, the gold standard of the embryonic stem cell.

However, by the next year Yamanaka's group overcame this hurdle and began producing chimeric mice from their iPS cells (Okita et al. 2007). These exciting discoveries propelled a number of studies that sought to understand the factors that control cellular reprogramming, including how to identify cells that share similar properties with ES cells, which factors control epigenetic changes and which factors are absolutely necessary for reprogramming (Maherali et al. 2007, Okita et al. 2008, Mikkelsen et al. 2008). Human iPS cells were quick to follow (Wernig et al. 2007, Takahashi et al. 2007, Yu et al. 2007) as these details were revealed, and now human iPS cells have been created from such diverse sources as an 89-year-old patient with ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease) (Dimos et al. 2008) and a person suffering from Parkinson's disease (Soldner et al. 2009).

Originally iPS cells were generated using a viral construct to insert the genetic material into the chromosome. Although successful, the lack of control over the location of virally inserted material and the number of copies inserted makes viruses unsuitable for iPS cell production in the long run, so other methods were quickly developed. In 2009, Yu et al. eliminated the need for continuous presence of vectors and transgene sequences that were previously required for reprogramming by using nonintegrating episomal vectors to generate iPS cells. It has also been shown that direct DNA delivery of the genes or the proteins that are produced by these genes can induce a pluripotent state (Zhou et al. 2009). Studies involving generation of iPS cells using microRNAs and small molecules are underway (Huangfu et al. 2008, Judson et al. 2009). Other efforts (Nakagawa et al. 2008, Wernig et al. 2008) have shown that not all the genes described initially are required to induce pluripotency; in fact, at least one paper described that Oct4 alone was enough to reprogram neural stem cells (Kim et al. 2009). These discoveries are moving the use of iPS cells closer to clinical application.

Chimeric mice produced by injection of MEF iPS cells into heterologous blastocysts. Image courtesy of Dr Miguel Esteban, Stem Cell and Cancer Biology Group, Key Laboratory of Regenerative Biology, South China Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510663, China.

Citations

Barile L et al. (2009). Bone marrow-derived cells can acquire cardiac stem cells properties in damaged heart. J Cell Mol Med 15, 63–71. PMID: 19912439

Becker AJ et al. (1963). Cytological demonstration of the clonal nature of spleen colonies derived from transplanted mouse marrow cells. Nature 197, 452–454. PMID: 13970094

Briggs R and King TJ (1952). Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs' eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 38, 455–463. PMID: 16589125

Dimos JT et al. (2008). Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science 321, 1218–1221. PMID: 18669821

Evans MJ and Kaufman MH (1981). Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156. PMID: 7242681

Gurdon JB (1962). The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J Embryol Exp Morphol 10, 622–640. PMID: 13951335

Huangfu D et al. (2008). Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nat Biotechnol 26, 795–797. PMID: 18568017

Judson RL et al. (2009). Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs promote induced pluripotency. Nat Biotechnol 27, 459–461. PMID: 19363475

Kahan BW and Ephrussi B (1970). Developmental potentialities of clonal in vitro cultures of mouse testicular teratoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 44, 1015–1036. PMID: 5514468

Kim JB et al. (2009). Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by Oct4. Nature 461, 649–643. PMID: 19718018

Kleinsmith LJ and Pierce GB, Jr. (1964). Multipotentiality of single embryonal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 24, 1544–1551. PMID: 14234000

Martin GR (1981). Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78, 7634–7638. PMID: 6950406

Mikkelsen TS et al. (2008). Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49–55. PMID: 18509334

Nakagawa M et al. (2008). Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nat Biotechnol 26, 101–106. PMID: 18059259

Okita K et al. (2007). Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 448, 313–317. PMID: 17554338

Siminovitch L et al. (1963). The distribution of colony-forming cells among spleen colonies. J Cell Physiol 62, 327–336. PMID: 14086156

Soldner F et al. (2009). Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 136, 964–977. PMID: 19269371

Takahashi K et al. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872. PMID: 18035408

Taupin P (2009). Adult neurogenesis, neural stem cells and Alzheimer's disease: Developments, limitations, problems, and promises. Curr Alzheimer Res 6, 461–470. PMID: 19747153

Thomson JA et al. (1995). Isolation of a primate embryonic stem cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 7844–7848. PMID: 7544005

Thomson JA et al. (1996). Pluripotent cell lines derived from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. Biol Reprod 55, 254–259. PMID: 8828827

Thomson JA et al. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147. PMID: 9804556

Till JE et al. (1964). A stochastic model of stem cell proliferation, based on the growth of spleen colony-forming cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 51, 29–36. PMID: 14104600

Wernig M et al. (2007). In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448, 318–324. PMID: 17554336

Wernig M et al. (2008). c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 2, 10–12. PMID: 18371415

Yu J and Thomson JA (2008). Pluripotent stem cell lines. Genes Dev 22, 1987–1997. PMID: 18676805

Yu J et al. (2007). Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318, 1917–1920. PMID: 18029452

Zhou H et al. (2009). Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell 4, 381–384. PMID: 19398399


 

Ask an Expert

Call us at +7 495 721 1404

Sign Up for Bio-Rad Updates!
Enter your email address below to receive your choice of the latest news, promotions, and more.